5. How to understand the existential assertion that everyone desperately lonely? 11.6. Uselessness philosophy (positivism) Non-classical doctrine created not only by representatives of the philosophy of life. In the XIX century. there are other currents, criticized the classical philosophical theories. The founder of one of them was a French philosopher of the XIX century. Auguste Comte, who offered to compare results of the special sciences with results of philosophical research. The first in its history moved forward significantly, increasing the man's strength and had a tremendous promoting progress. They have successfully coped with their tasks and allow people to penetrate into the many mysteries of nature: it is enough to compare the level of knowledge of those who lived five thousand years ago, our, to see how much is not in vain there are private science. With the philosophy of the situation it is just the opposite: putting ourselves global goals, it could not implement them. What we know today in the philosophical sense, which would not have known our ancestors? Absolutely nothing! Just like them, we do not know, where did the world and that it largely is. We are now, as a thousand years ago, do not know how it works, and there is what kind of laws. We can not say anything about the future, and still do not know the meaning of life. It turns out that the special sciences (also can be called empirical, because they are experimentally investigate any area of ??the world, or natural) set themselves the questions that might well give some affirmative or positive (positive) answers. But philosophy set itself such questions, which could not answer, or rather, these answers were always vague (whether so, or not), that is neutverditelnymi. The results so it can be evaluated as negative (negative). Due to the above question arises whether it is necessary philosophy? Is not it better to reject it as a futile exercise and leave only the empirical, positive or positive science?