The belief in some "legitimate norms' limits and creates the illusion of simplicity distinguish objectively necessary and surplus (the latter declared the result of voluntarism, totalitarianism, vices, etc.). Here, civil war disaster B.P.Kurashvili explains, inter alia, "excessive and unreasonable destructiveness onslaught of the revolutionary forces." Even so, it is unlikely to be the explanation, because the question is, what is called "excessive and unreasonable", what is their nature. What are the grounds to speak about excessive "stress"? During the confrontation the two sides were on the limit strength, and to any excessiveness just did not have the resources. Because-and there were many victims - forces only enough to pull the trigger. When the skin was near Tula, red and white were the two dystrophies: none has the power to protect themselves, but the enemy can not hit and. Just as the Germans were outside Moscow in December, 1941: in some areas between them and the Kremlin was not a single battalion of fighting, and to take a step they had no forces. In general, talk about the measures and excessive total war is far from safe - a risky business. It's like that on a full stomach to talk, you have to become a Human meat, bring to a deadly famine. The question is incorrect and forbidden.